Apple approves Spotify update with external payment links for US iPhone users

Spotify has confirmed that Apple has approved its latest app update in the US. This change will allow iPhone users in the country to access pricing information and external payment links on the music streaming platform. The approval comes after a US judge ordered the Cupertino-based tech giant to stop charging commissions on in-app purchases through iPhone apps. The updated app, version 9.0.40, started rolling out on the App Store in the US, a day after Spotify submitted the same to Apple. The update allows Spotify to inform customers about different subscription options and their costs within the iPhone app.
Users can also link out to purchase or change their Spotify subscription plan on Spotify's website.
Moreover, purchases on Spotify's website will not be subject to Apple’s 30% service charge on in-app payments. Spotify will now be able to inform US customers about promotional offers within the app. This comes after Apple said that it will comply with the court’s order; however, the iPhone maker noted that it strongly disagrees with the decision and will appeal.

In a statement to TechCrunch, Spotify spokesperson Jeanna Moran said: “In a victory for consumers, artists, creators, and authors, Apple has approved Spotify’s U.S. app update. After nearly a decade, this will finally allow us to freely show clear pricing information and links to purchase, fostering transparency and choice for U.S. consumers. We can now give consumers lower prices, more control, and easier access to the Spotify experience. There is more work to do, but today represents a significant milestone for developers and entrepreneurs everywhere who want to build and compete on a more level playing field. It’s the opening act of a new era, and we could not be more ready for the show.”

In a recent ruling, US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said that Apple breached an order to modify its App Store. The company had been instructed to let developers direct users to their websites for purchases. The judgment states that Apple intentionally ignored the mandate and sought to impose new anticompetitive obstacles.